2015年6月英语六级真题卷第一套(含答案)

2015年6月大学英语六级考试真题（第一套）
Part III Reading Comprehension (40 minutes)
Section A
Questions 36 to 45 are based on the following passage.

put this 36____ into practice. Now technology has become the new field for the age-old battle
between adults and their freedom-seeking kids.
Locked indoors, unable to get on their bicycles and hang out with their friends, teens have
turned to social media and their mobile phones to socialize with their peers. What they do online
often 37____ what they might otherwise do if their mobility weren't so heavily 38____ in the age
of helicopter parenting. Social media and smart-phone apps have become so popular in recent
years because teens need a place to call their own. They want the freedom to 39____ their identity
and the world around them. Instead of 40____ out, they jump online.
As teens have moved online, parents have projected their fears onto the Internet, imagining
all the 41____ dangers that youth might face 一from 42____ strangers to cruel peers to pictures
orwords that could haunt them on Google for the rest of their lives.
Rather than helping teens develop strategies for negotiating public life and the risks of 43
____with others, fear-full parents have focused on tracking, monitoring and blocking. These
tactics（策略）don't help teens develop the skills they need to manage complex social situations,
44____ risks and get help when they're in trouble.
do, but it 45____ the learning that teens need to do as they come of age in a technology-soaked
world.
A) assess B) constrained C) contains D) explore
E) influence F) interacting G) interpretation H) magnified
I) mirrors J) philosophy K) potential L) sneaking
M) sticking N) undermines O) violent
Section B
Inequality Is Not Inevitable
[A] A dangerous trend has developed over this past third of a century. A country that experienced
shared growth after World War II began to tear apart, so much so that when the Great Recession
hit in late 2007, one could no longer ignore the division that had come to define the American
economic landscape. How did this
greatest level of inequality?
[B] Over the past year and a half, The Great divide, a series in The New York Times, has
presented
a wide range of examples that undermine the notion that there are any truly fundamental laws of
capitalism. The dynamics of the imperial capitalism of the 19th century needn't apply in the
democracies of the 21st. we don't need to have this much inequality in America.
[C] Our current brand of capitalism is a fake capitalism. For proof of this go back to our response
to the Great Recession, where we socialized losses, even as we privatized gains. Perfect
competition should drive profits to zero, at least theoretically, but we have monopolies making
persistently high profits. C.E.O.s enjoy incomes that are on average 295 times that of the typical
worker, a much higher ratio than in the past, without any evidence of a proportionate increase in

productivity.
[D] If it is not the cruel laws of economics that have led to America's great divide, what is it? The
straightforward answer: our policies and our politics. People get tired of hearing about
Scandinavian success stories, but the fact of the matter is that Sweden, Finland and Norway have
all succeeded in having about as much or faster growth in per capita（人均的）incomes than the
United States and with far greater equality.
[E] So why has America chosen these inequality-enhancing policies? Part of the answer is that as
World War II faded into memory, so too did the solidarity it had created. As America triumphed
in
the Cold War, there didn't seem to be a real competitor to our economic model. Without this
international competition, we no longer had to show that our system could deliver for most of our
citizens.
[F] Ideology and interests combine viciously. Some drew the wrong lesson from the collapse of
the Soviet system in 1991. The pendulum swung from much too much government there to much
too little here. Corporate interests argued for getting rid of regulations, even when those
regulations had done so much to protect and improve our environment, our safety, our health and
the economy itself.
[G] But this ideology was hypocritical（虚伪的）. The bankers, among the strongest advocates of
laissez- faire（自由放任的）economics, were only too willing to accept hundreds of billions of
dollars from the government in the aid programs that have been a recurring feature of the global
economy since the beginning of the Thatcher-Reagan era of
[H] The American political system is overrun by money. Economic inequality translates into
political in-equality, and political inequality yields increasing economic inequality. So corporate
welfare increases as we reduce welfare for the poor. Congress maintains subsidies for rich farmers
as we cut back on nutritional support for the needy. Drug companies have been given hundreds of
billions of dollars as we limit Medicaid benefits. The banks that brought on the global financial
crisis got billions while a tiny bit went to the homeowners and victims of the same banks'
predatory（掠夺性的）lending practices. This last decision was particularly foolish. There were
alternatives to throwing money at the banks and hoping it would circulate through increased
lending.
[I] Our divisions are deep. Economic and geographic segregation has immunized those at the top
from the problems of those down below. Like the kings of ancient times' they have come to
perceive their privileged positions essentially as a natural right.
[J] Our economy, our democracy and our society have paid for these gross inequalities. The true
test of an economy is not how much wealth its princes can accumulate in tax havens（庇护所）, but
how well off the typical citizen is. But average incomes are lower than they were a quarter-century
ago. Growth has gone to the very, very top, whose share has almost increased four times since
1980. Money that was meant to have trickled（流淌）down has instead evaporated in the agreeable
climate of the Cayman Islands.
[K] With almost a quarter of American children younger than 5 living in poverty, and with
America doing so little for its poor, the deprivations of one generation are being visited upon the
next. Of course, no country has ever come close to providing complete equality of opportunity.
But why is America one of the advanced countries where the life prospects of the young are most
sharply determined by the income and education of their parents?

[L] Among the most bitter stories in The Great Divide were those that portrayed the frustrations of
the young, who long to enter our shrinking middle class. Soaring tuitions and declining incomes
have resulted in larger debt burdens. Those with only a high school diploma have seen their
incomes decline by 13 percent over the past 35 years.
[M] Where justice is concerned, there is also a huge divide. In the eyes of the rest of the world and
a significant part of its own population, mass imprisonment has come to define America—a
country, it bears repeating, with about 5 percent of the world's population but around a fourth of
the world 's prisoners.
[N] Justice has become a commodity, affordable to only a few. While Wall Street executives used
their expensive lawyers to ensure that their ranks were not held accountable for the misdeeds that
the crisis in 2008 so graphically revealed, the banks abused our legal system to foreclose（取消赎
回权）on mortgages and eject tenants, some of whom did not even owe money.
[O] More than a half-century ago, America led the way in advocating for the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948. Today, access to health care
is among the most universally accepted rights, at least in the advanced countries. America, despite
the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, is the exception. In the relief that many felt when
the Supreme Court did not overturn the Affordable Care Act, the implications of the decision for
Medicaid were not fully appreciated. Obamacare's objective 一to ensure that all Americans have
access to health care — has been blocked: 24 states have not implemented the expanded Medicaid
program, which was the means by which Obamacare was supposed to deliver on its promise to
some of the poorest.
[P] We need not just a new war on poverty but a war to protect the middle class. Solutions to these
problems do not have to be novel. Far from it. Making markets act like markets would be a good
place to start. We must end the rent-seeking society we have gravitated toward, in which the
wealthy obtain profits by manipulating the system.
[Q] The problem of inequality is not so much a matter of technical economics. It's really a
problem of practical politics. Inequality is not just about the top marginal tax rate but also about
our children's access to food and the right to justice for all. If we spent more on education, health
and infrastructure（基础设施）, we would strengthen our economy, now and in the future.
46. In theory, free competition is supposed to reduce the margin of profits to the minimum.
47. The United States is now characterized by a great division between the rich and the poor.
48. America lacked the incentive to care for the majority of its citizens as it found no rival for its
economic model.
49. The wealthy top have come to take privileges for granted.
50. Many examples show the basic laws of imperial capitalism no longer apply in present-day
America.
51. The author suggests a return to the true spirit of the market.
52. A quarter of the world's prisoner population is in America.
53. Government regulation in America went from one extreme to the other in the past two
decades.
54. Justice has become so expensive that only a small number of people like corporate executives
can afford it.
55. No country in the world so far has been able to provide completely equal opportunities for all.
Section C

Passage One
Questions 56 to 60 are based on the following passage.
I'll admit I've never quite understood the obsession（难以破除的成见）surrounding
genetically modified (GM) crops. To environmentalist opponents, GM foods are simply evil, an
understudied, possibly harmful tool used by big agricultural businesses to control global seed
markets and crush local farmers. They argue that GM foods have never delivered on their
supposed promise, that money spent on GM crops would be better channeled to organic farming
and that consumers should be protected with warning labels on any products that contain
genetically modified ingredients. To supporters, GM crops are a key part of the effort to
sustainably provide food to meet a growing global population. But more than that, supporters see
the GM opposition of many environmentalists as fundamentally anti-science, no different than
those who question the basics of man-made climate change.
For both sides, GM foods seem to act as a symbol: you're pro-agricultural business or
anti-science. But science is exactly what we need more of when it comes to GM foods, which is
why I was happy to see Nature devote a special series of articles to the GM food controversy. The
conclusion: while GM crops haven't yet realized their initial promise and have been dominated by
agricultural businesses, there is reason to continue to use and develop them to help meet the
enormous challenge of sustainably feeding a growing planet.
That doesn't mean GM crops are perfect, or a one-size-fits-all solution to global agriculture
problems. But anything that can increase farming efficiency 一the amount of crops we can
produce per acre of land 一will be extremely useful. GM crops can and almost certainly will be
part of that suite of tools' but so will traditional plant breeding, improved soil and crop
management 一and perhaps most important of all, better storage and transport infrastructure（基
础设施）, especially in the developing world. (It doesn't do much good for farmers in places like
sub-Saharan Africa to produce more food if they can't get it to hungry consumers.) I'd like to see
more non-industry research done on GM crops—not just because we'd worry less about bias, but
also because seed companies like Monsanto and Pioneer shouldn't be the only entities working to
harness genetic modification. I'd like to see GM research on less commercial crops, like com. I
don't think it's vital to label GM ingredients in food, but I also wouldn't be against it 一and
industry would be smart to go along with labeling, just as a way of removing fears about the
technology.
Most of all, though, I wish a tenth of the energy that's spent endlessly debating GM crops was
focused on those more pressing challenges for global agriculture. There are much bigger battles to
fight.
56. How do environmentalist opponents view GM foods according to the passage?
A) They will eventually ruin agriculture and the environment.
B) They are used by big businesses to monopolize agriculture.
C) They have proved potentially harmful to consumers' health.
D) They pose a tremendous threat to current farming practice.

57. What does the author say is vital to solving the controversy between the two sides of the
debate?
A) Breaking the GM food monopoly. B) More friendly exchange of ideas.
C) Regulating GM food production. D) More scientific research on GM crops.

58. What is the main point of the Nature articles?
A) Feeding the growing population makes it imperative to develop GM crops.
B) Popularizing GM technology will help it to live up to its initial promises.
C) Measures should be taken to ensure the safety of GM foods.
D) Both supporters and opponents should make compromises.

59. What is the author's view on the solution to agricultural problems?
A) It has to depend more and more on GM technology.
B) It is vital to the sustainable development of human society.
C) GM crops should be allowed until better alternatives are found.
D) Whatever is useful to boost farming efficiency should be encouraged.

60. What does the author think of the ongoing debate around GM crops?
A) It arises out of ignorance of and prejudice against new science.
B) It distracts the public attention from other key issues of the world.
C) Efforts spent on it should be turned to more urgent issues of agriculture.
D) Neither side is likely to give in until more convincing evidence is found.

Passage Two
Questions 61 to 65 are based on the following passage.
Early decision — you apply to one school, and admission is binding — seems like a great
choice for nervous applicants. Schools let in a higher percentage of early-decision applicants,
which arguably means that you have a better chance of getting in. And if you do, you're done with
the whole agonizing process by December. But what most students and parents don't realize is that
schools have hidden motives for offering early decision.
Early decision, since it's binding, allows schools to fill their classes with qualified students; it
allows ad-missions committees to select the students that are in particular demand for their college
and know those students will come. It also gives schools a higher yield rate, which is often used as
one of the ways to measure college selectivity and popularity.
The problem is that this process effectively shortens the window of time students have to
make one of the most important decisions of their lives up to that point. Under regular admissions,
seniors have until May 1 to choose which school to attend; early decision effectively steals six
months from them, months that could be used to visit more schools, do more research, speak to
current students and alumni（校友）and arguably make a more informed decision.
There are, frankly, an astonishing number of exceptional colleges in America, and for any
given student, there are a number of schools that are a great fit. When students become too fixated
（专注）on a particular school early in the admissions process, that fixation can lead to severe
disappointment if they don't get in or, if they do, the possibility that they are now bound to go to a
school that, given time for further reflection, may not actually be right for them.
Insofar as early decision offers a genuine admissions edge, that advantage goes largely to
students who already have numerous advantage. The students who use early decision tend to be
those who have received higher- quality college guidance, usually a result of coming from a more
privileged background. In this regard, there's an argument against early decision, as students from

lower-income families are far less likely to have the admissions know-how to navigate the often
confusing early deadlines.
Students who have done their research and are confident that there's one school they would
be thrilled to get into should, under the current system, probably apply under early decision. But
for students who haven't yet done enough research, or who are still constantly changing their
minds on favorite schools, the early-decision system needlessly and prematurely narrows the field
of possibility just at a time when students should be opening themselves to a whole range of
thrilling options.
61. What are students obliged to do under early decision?
A) Look into a lot of schools before they apply. B) Attend the school once they are admitted.
C) Think twice before they accept the offer. D) Consult the current students and alumni.

62. Why do schools offer early decision?
A) To make sure they get qualified students.
B) To avoid competition with other colleges.
C) To provide more opportunities for applicants.
D) To save students the agony of choosing a school.

63. What is said to be the problem with early decision for students?
A) It makes their application process more complicated.
B) It places too high a demand on their research ability.
C) It allows them little time to make informed decisions.
D) It exerts much more psychological pressure on them.

64. Why are some people opposed to early decision?
A) It interferes with students' learning in high school.
B) It is biased against students at ordinary high schools.
C) It causes unnecessary confusion among college applicants.
D) It places students from lower-income families at a disadvantage.

65. What does the author advise college applicants to do?
A) Refrain from competing with students from privileged families.
B) Avoid choosing early decision unless they are fully prepared.
C) Find sufficient information about their favorite schools.
D) Look beyond the few supposedly thrilling options.
Part IV Translation (30 minutes)
2011 年是中国城市化（urbanization）进程中的历史性时刻，其城市人口首次超过农村
人口。在未来20 年里，预计有3.5 亿农村人口将移居城市。如此规模的城市发展对城市交
通来说既是挑战，也是机遇。中国政府一直提倡“以人为本”的发展理念，强调人们以公交而
不是私家车出行。它还号召建设“资源节约和环境友好型”社会。有了这个明确的目标，中国
城市就可以更好地规划其发展，并把大量投资转向安全、清洁和经济型交通系统的发展上。

2015 年6 月大学英语六级考试真题（第二套）
Part III Reading Comprehension (40 minutes)
Reading comprehension
Section A
Innovation, the elixir (灵丹妙药) of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the
Industrial Revolution hand weavers were ___36___ aside by the mechanical loom. Over the past
30 years the digital revolution has ___37___ many of the mid-skill jobs that underpinned
20th-century middle-class life. Typists, ticket agents, bank tellers and many production-line jobs
have been dispensed with, just as the weavers were.
For those who believe that technological progress has made the world a better place, such
disruption is a natural part of rising ___38___. Although innovation kills some jobs, it creates new
and better ones, as a more ___39___ society becomes richer and its wealthier inhabitants demand
more goods and services. A hundred years ago one in three American workers was ___40___ on a
farm. Today less than 2% of them produce far more food. The millions freed from the land were
not rendered ___41___, but found better-paid work as the economy grew more sophisticated.
Today the pool of secretaries has___42___, but there are ever more computer programmers and
web designers.
Optimism remains the right starting-point, but for workers the dislocating effects of
technology may make themselves evident faster than its ___43___. Even if new jobs and
wonderful products emerge, in the short term income gaps will widen, causing huge social
dislocation and perhaps even changing politics. Technology's ___44___ will feel like a tornado
(旋风), hitting the rich world first, but ___45___ sweeping through poorer countries too. No
government is prepared for it.
A）benefits B）displaced C）employed D）eventually
E）impact F）jobless G）primarily H）productive
I）prosperity J）responsive K）rhythm L）sentiments
M）shrunk N）swept O）withdrawn

Section B
Why the Mona Lisa Stands Out
[A] Have you ever fallen for a novel and been amazed not to find it on lists of great books? Or
walked around a sculpture renowned as a classic, struggling to see what the fuss is about? If so,
you?ve probably pondered the question Cutting asked himself that day: how does a work of art
come to be considered great?
[B] The intuitive answer is that some works of art are just great: of intrinsically superior quality.
The paintings that win prime spots in galleries, get taught in classes and reproduced in books are
the ones that have proved their artistic value over time. If you can?t see they?re superior, that?s
your problem. It?s an intimidatingly neat explanation. But some social scientists have been asking
awkward questions of it, raising the possibility that artistic canons are little more than fossilised
historical accidents.
[C] Cutting, a professor at Cornell University, wondered if a psychological mechanism known as
the “mere-exposure effect” played a role in deciding which paintings rise to the top of the cultural
league. Cutting designed an experiment to test his hunch. Over a lecture course he regularly

showed undergraduates works of impressionism for two seconds at a time. Some of the paintings
were canonical, included in art-history books. Others were lesser known but of comparable
quality.
These were exposed four times as often. Afterwards, the students preferred them to the canonical
works, while a control group of students liked the canonical ones best. Cutting?s students had
grown to like those paintings more simply because they had seen them more.
[D] Cutting believes his experiment offers a clue as to how canons are formed. He points out that
the most reproduced works of impressionism today tend to have been bought by five or six
wealthy and influential collectors in the late 19th century. The preferences of these men bestowed
prestige on certain works, which made the works more likely to be hung in galleries and printed in
anthologies. The fame passed down the years, gaining momentum from mere exposure as it did so.
The more people were exposed to, the more they liked it, and the more they liked it, the more it
appeared in books, on posters and in big exhibitions. Meanwhile, academics and critics created
sophisticated justifications for its pre-eminence. After all, it?s not just the masses who tend to rate
what they see more often more highly. As contemporary artists like Warhol and Damien Hirst
have
grasped, critical acclaim is deeply entwined with publicity. “Scholars”, Cutting argues, “are no
different from the public in the effects of mere exposure.”
[E] The process described by Cutting evokes a principle that the sociologist Duncan Watts calls
“cumulative advantage”: once a thing becomes popular, it will tend to become more popular still.
A few years ago, Watts, who is employed by Microsoft to study the dynamics of social networks,
had a similar experience to Cutting in another Paris museum. After queuing to see the “Mona
Lisa” in its climate-controlled bulletproof box at the Louvre, he came away puzzled: why was it
considered so superior to the three other Leonardos in the previous chamber, to which nobody
seemed to be paying the slightest attention?
[F] When Watts looked into the history of “the greatest painting of all time”, he discovered that,
for most of its life, the “Mona Lisa” remained in relative obscurity. In the 1850s, Leonardo da
Vinci was considered no match for giants of Renaissance art like Titian and Raphael, whose works
were worth almost ten times as much as the “Mona Lisa”. It was only in the 20th century that
Leonardo?s portrait of his patron?s wife rocketed to the number-one spot. What propelled it there
wasn?t a scholarly re-evaluation, but a theft.
[G] In 1911 a maintenance worker at the Louvre walked out of the museum with the “Mona Lisa”
hidden under his smock. Parisians were aghast at the theft of a painting to which, until then, they
had paid little attention. When the museum reopened, people queued to see the gap where the
“Mona Lisa” had once hung in a way they had never done for the painting itself. From then on, the
“Mona Lisa” came to represent Western culture itself.
[H] Although many have tried, it does seem improbable that the painting?s unique status can be
attributed entirely to the quality of its brushstrokes. It has been said that the subject?s eyes follow
the viewer around the room. But as the painting?s biographer, Donald Sassoon, dryly notes, “In
reality the effect can be obtained from any portrait.” Duncan Watts proposes that the “Mona Lisa”
is merely an extreme example of a general rule. Paintings, poems and pop songs are buoyed or
sunk by random events or preferences that turn into waves of influence, rippling down the
generations.
[I] “Saying that cultural objects have value,” Brian Eno once wrote, “is like saying that telephones

have conversations.” Nearly all the cultural objects we consume arrive wrapped in inherited
opinion; our preferences are always, to some extent, someone else?s. Visitors to the “Mona Lisa”
know they are about to visit the greatest work of art ever and come away appropriately
impressed—or let down. An audience at a performance of “Hamlet” know it is regarded as a work
of genius, so that is what they mostly see. Watts even calls the pre-eminence of Shakespeare a
“historical accident”.
[J] Although the rigid high-low distinction fell apart in the 1960s, we still use culture as a badge of
identity. Today?s fashion for eclecticism—“I love Bach, Abba and Jay Z”—is, Shamus Khan , a
Columbia University psychologist, argues, a new way for the middle class to distinguish
themselves from what they perceive to be the narrow tastes of those beneath them in the social
hierarchy.
[K] The intrinsic quality of a work of art is starting to seem like its least important attribute. But
perhaps it?s more significant than our social scientists allow. First of all, a work needs a certain
quality to be eligible to be swept to the top of the pile. The “Mona Lisa” may not be a worthy
world champion, but it was in the Louvre in the first place, and not by accident. Secondly, some
stuff is simply better than other stuff. Read “Hamlet” after reading even the greatest of
Shakespeare?s contemporaries, and the difference may strike you as unarguable.
[L] A study in the British Journal of Aesthetics suggests that the exposure effect doesn?t work the
same way on everything, and points to a different conclusion about how canons are formed. The
social scientists are right to say that we should be a little skeptical of greatness, and that we
should always look in the next room. Great art and mediocrity can get confused, even by experts.
But that?s why we need to see, and read, as much as we can. The more we?re exposed to the good
and the bad, the better we are at telling the difference. The eclecticists have it.
46. According to Duncan Watts, the superiority of the
resulted from the cumulative advantage.
47. Some social scientists have raised doubts about the intrinsic value of certain works of art.
48. It is often random events or preferences that determine the fate of a piece of art.
49. In his experiment, Cutting found that his subjects liked lesser known works better than
canonical works because of more exposure.
50. The author thinks the greatness of an art work still lies in its intrinsic value.
51. It is true of critics as well as ordinary people that the popularity of artistic works is closely
associated with publicity.
52. We need to expose ourselves to more art and literature in order to tell the superior from the
inferior.
53. A study of the history of the greatest paintings suggests even a great work of art could
experience years of neglect.
54. Culture is still used as a mark to distinguish one social class from another.
55. Opinions about and preferences for cultural objects are often inheritable.
Section C
Passage One
Questions 56 to 60 are based on the following passage.
When the right person is holding the right job at the right moment, that person's influence is
greatly expanded. That is the position in which Janet Yellen, who is expected to be confirmed as
the next chair of the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) in January, now finds herself. If you believe, as

many do, that unemployment is the major economic and social concern of our day, then it is no
stretch to think Yellen is the most powerful person in the world right now.
Throughout the 2008 financial crisis and the recession and recovery that followed, central
banks have taken on the role of stimulators of last resort, holding up the global economy with vast
amounts of money in the form of asset buying. Yellen, previously a Fed vice chair, was one of the
principal architects of the Fed's $$3.8 trillion money dump. A star economist known for her
groundbreaking work on labor markets, Yeilen was a kind of prophetess early on in the crisis for
her warnings about the subprime（次级债）meltdown. Now it will be her job to get the Fed and the
markets out of the biggest and most unconventional monetary program in history without derailing
the fragile recovery.
The good news is that Yellen, 67, is particularly well suited to meet these challenges. She has
a keen understanding of financial markets, an appreciation for their imperfections and a strong
belief that human suffering was more related to unemployment than anything else.
Some experts worry that Yellen will be inclined to chase unemployment to the neglect of inflation.
But with wages still relatively flat and the economy increasingly divided between the well-off and
the long-term unemployed' more people worry about the opposite, deflation（通货紧缩）that would
aggravate the economy's problems.
Either way, the incoming Fed chief will have to walk a fine line in slowly ending the stimulus.
It must be steady enough to deflate bubbles（去泡沫）and bring markets back down to earth but not
so quick that it creates another credit crisis.
Unlike many past Fed leaders, Yellen is not one to buy into the finance industry's argument
that it should be left alone to regulate itself. She knows all along the Fed has been too slack on
regulation of finance.
Yellen is likely to address right after she pushes unemployment below 6%, stabilizes markets
and makes sure that the recovery is more inclusive and robust. As Princeton Professor Alan
Blinder says'
can persuade without creating hostility.
new power player takes on its most annoying problems.
56. What do many people think is the biggest problem facing Janet Yellen?
A) Lack of money. B) Subprime crisis. C) Unemployment. D) Social instability.
57. What did Yellen help the Fed do to tackle the 2008 financial crisis?
A) Take effective measures to curb inflation.
B) Deflate the bubbles in the American economy.
C) Formulate policies to help financial institutions.
D) Pour money into the market through asset buying.
58. What is a greater concern of the general public?
A) Recession. B) Deflation. C) Inequality. D) Income.
59. What is Yellen likely to do in her position as the Fed chief?
A) Develop a new monetary program. B) Restore public confidence.
C) Tighten financial regulation. D) Reform the credit system.
60. How does Alan Blinder portray Yellen?
A) She possesses strong persuasive power.
B) She has confidence in what she is doing.
C) She is one of the world's greatest economists.

D) She is the most powerful Fed chief in history.
Passage Two
Questions 61 to 65 are based on the following passage.
Air pollution is deteriorating in many places around the world. The fact that public parks in
cities become crowded as soon as the sun shines proves that people long to breathe in green, open
spaces. They do not all know what they are seeking but they flock there, nevertheless. And, in
these surroundings, they are generally both peaceful and peaceable. It is rare to see people fighting
in a garden. Perhaps struggle unfolds first, not at an economic or social level, but over the
appropriation of air, essential to life itself. If human beings can breathe and share air, they don't
need to struggle with one another.
Unfortunately, in our western tradition, neither materialist nor idealist theoreticians give
enough consideration to this basic condition for life. As for politicians, despite proposing curbs on
environmental pollution, they have not yet called for it to be made a crime. Wealthy countries are
even allowed to pollute if they pay for it.
But is our life worth anything other than money? The plant world shows us in silence what
faithfulness to life consists of. It also helps us to a new beginning, urging us to care for our breath,
not only at a vital but also at a spiritual level. The interdependence to which we must pay the
closest attention is that which exists between ourselves and the plant world. Often described as

releasing oxygen. But their capacity to renew the air polluted by industry has long reached its
limit.
If we lack the air necessary for a healthy life, it is because we have filled it with chemicals and
undercut the ability of plants to regenerate it. As we know, rapid deforestation combined with the
massive burning of fossil fuels is an explosive recipe for an irreversible disaster.
The fight over the appropriation of resources will lead the entire planet to hell unless humans
learn to share life, both with each other and with plants. This task is simultaneously ethical and
political because it can be discharged only when each takes it upon herself or himself and only
when it is accomplished together with others. The lesson taught by plants is that sharing life
expands and enhances the sphere of the living, while dividing life into so-called natural or human
resources diminishes it. We must come to view the air, the plants and ourselves as the contributors
to the preservation of life and growth, rather than a web of quantifiable objects or productive
potentialities at our disposal. Perhaps then we would finally begin to live, rather than being
concerned with bare survival.
61. What does the author assume might be the primary reason that people would struggle with
each other?
A) To get their share of clean air. B) To pursue a comfortable life.
C) To gain a higher social status. D) To seek economic benefits.
62. What does the author accuse western politicians of?
A) Depriving common people of the right to clean air.
B) Giving priority to theory rather than practical action.
C) Offering preferential treatment to wealthy countries.
D) Failing to pass laws to curb environmental pollution.
63. What does the author try to draw our closest attention to?
A) The massive burning of fossil fuels.

B) Our relationship to the plant world.
C) The capacity of plants to renew polluted air.
D) Large-scale deforestation across the world.
64. How can human beings accomplish the goal of protecting the planet according to the author?
A) By showing respect for plants. B) By preserving all forms of life.
C) By tapping all natural resources. D) By pooling their efforts together.
65. What does the author suggest we do in order not just to survive?
A) Expand the sphere of living. B) Develop nature's potentials.
C) Share life with nature. D) Allocate the resources.
Part IV Translation (30 minutes)
中国传统的待客之道要求饭菜丰富多样，让客人吃不完。中国宴席上典型的菜单包括开
席的一套凉菜及其后的热菜，例如：肉类，鸡鸭，蔬菜等。大多数宴席上，全鱼被认为是必
不可少的，除非已经上过各式海鲜。如今，中国人喜欢把西方特色菜与传统中式菜肴溶于一
席，因此牛排上桌也不少见。沙拉也已流行起来，尽管传统上中国人一般不吃任何未经烹饪
的菜肴。宴席通常至少有一道汤，可以最先或最后上桌。甜点和水果通常标志宴席的结束。
2015 年6 月大学英语六级考试真题（第三套）
Part III
Section A
Questions 36 to 45 are based on the following passage.
Travel websites have been around since the 1990s, when Expedia, Travelocity, and other
holiday booking sites were launched, allowing travelers to compare flight and hotel prices with the
click of a mouse. With information no longer 36____ by travel agents or hidden in business
networks, the travel industry was revolutionized, as greater transparency helped 37____ prices.
Today, the industry is going through a new revolution—this time transforming service quality.
Online rating platforms—38____ in hotels, restaurants, apartments, and taxis—allow travelers to
exchange reviews and experiences for all to see.
Hospitality businesses are now ranked, analyzed, and compared not by industry 39____, but
by the very people for whom the service is intended—the customer. This has 40____ a new
relationship between buyer and seller. Customers have always voted with their feet; they can now
explain their decision to anyone who is interested. As a result, businesses are much more 41____,
often in very specific ways, which creates powerful 42____ to improve service.
Although some readers might not care for gossipy reports of unfriendly bellboys（行李员）in
Berlin or malfunctioning hotel hairdryers in Houston, the true power of online reviews lies not just
in the individual stories, but in the websites' 43____ to aggregate a large volume of ratings.
The impact cannot be 44____. Businesses that attract top ratings can enjoy rapid growth, as
new customers are attracted by good reviews and 45____ provide yet more positive feedback. So
great is the influence of online ratings that many companies now hire digital reputation managers
to ensure a favorable online identity.
A) accountable B) capacity C) controlled D) entail
E) forged F) incentives G) occasionally H) overstated
I) persisting J) pessimistic K) professionals L) slash
M) specializing N) spectators O) subsequently
Section B

Plastic Surgery
A better credit card is the solution to ever larger hack attacks
[A] A thin magnetic stripe (magstripe) is all that stands between your credit-card information and
the bad guys. And they've been working hard to break in. That's why 2014 is shaping up as a
major showdown: banks, law enforcement and technology companies are all trying to stop a
network of hackers who are succeeding in stealing account numbers, names, email addresses and
other crucial data used in identity theft. More than 100 million accounts at Target, Neiman Marcus
and Michaels stores were affected in some way during the most recent attacks, starting last
November.
[B] Swipe（刷卡）is the operative word: cards are increasingly vulnerable to attacks when you
make purchases in a store. In several recent incidents, hackers have been able to obtain massive
information of credit-, debit-（借记）or prepaid-card numbers using malware, i.e. malicious
software, inserted secretly into the retailers' point-of-sale system—the checkout registers. Hackers
then sold the data to a second group of criminals operating in shadowy comers of the web. Not
long after, the stolen data was showing up on fake cards and being used for online purchases.
[C] The solution could cost as little as $$2 extra for every piece of plastic issued. The fix is a
security technology used heavily outside the U.S. While American credit cards use the 40-year-old
magstripe technology to process transactions, much of the rest of the world uses smarter cards
with a technology called EMV (short for Europay, MasterCard, Visa) that employs a chip
embedded in the card plus a customer PIN (personal identification number) to authenticate（验证）
every transaction on the spot. If a purchaser fails to punch in the correct PIN at the checkout, the
transaction gets rejected. (Online purchases can be made by setting up a separate transaction
code.)
[D] Why haven't big banks adopted the more secure technology? When it comes to mailing out
new credit cards, it's all about relative costs, says David Robertson, who runs the Nihon Report, an
industry newsletter:
expiration date, embossing（凸印）it, the small envelop—all put together, you are in the dollar
range.
chips. (Once large issuers convert together, the chip costs should drop.)
[E] Multiply $$3 by the more than 5 billion magstripe credit and prepaid cards in circulation in the
U.S. Then consider that there's an estimated $$12.4 billion in card fraud on a global basis' says
Robertson. With 44% of that in the U.S., American credit-card fraud amounts to about $$5.5 billion
annually. Card issuers have so far calculated that absorbing the liability for even big hacks like the
Target one is still cheaper than replacing all that plastic.
[F] That leaves American retailers pretty much alone the world over in relying on magstripe
technology to charge purchases—and leaves consumers vulnerable. Each magstripe has three
tracks of information, explains payments security expert Jeremy Gumbley, the chief technology
officer of CreditCall, an electronic-payments company. The first and third are used by the bank or
card issuer. Your vital account information lives on the second track, which hackers try to capture.

text file that gets stolen.
[G] Chip- and-PIN cards, by contrast, make fake cards or skimming impossible because the
information that gets scanned is encrypted（加密）. The historical reason the U.S. has stuck with
magstripe, ironically enough, is once superior technology. Our cheap, ultra-reliable wired

networks made credit-card authentication over the phone frictionless. In France, card companies
created EMV in part because the telephone monopoly was so maddeningly inefficient and
expensive. The EMV solution allowed transactions to be verified locally and securely.
[H] Some big banks, like Wells Fargo, are now offering to convert your magstripe card to a
chip-and-PIN model. (It's actually a hybrid（混合体）that will still have a magstripe, since most
U.S. merchants don't have EMV terminals.) Should you take them up on it? If you travel
internationally, the answer is yes.
[I] Keep in mind, too, that credit cards typically have better liability protection than debit cards. If
someone uses your credit card fraudulently（欺诈性地）it's the issuer or merchant, not you, that
takes the hit. Debit cards have different liability limits depending on the bank and the events
surrounding any fraud.
bank,
over debit cards because of liability issues.
[J] Retailers and banks stand to benefit from the lower fraud levels of chip-and- PIN cards but have
been reluctant for years to invest in the new infrastructure（基础设施）needed for the technology,
especially if consumers don't have access to it. It's a chicken-and-egg problem; no one wants to
spend the money on upgraded point- of-sale systems that can read the chip cards if shoppers aren't
carrying them 一yet there's little point in consumers' carrying the fancy plastic if stores aren't
equipped to use them. (An earlier effort by Target to move to chip and PIN never gained
progress.)
According to Gumbley, there's a （僵局）has to be broken.
[K] JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon recently expressed his willingness to do so, noting that
banks and merchants have spent the past decade suing each other over interchange fees—the
percentage of the transaction price they keep- rather than deal with the growing hacking problem.
Chase offers a chip-enabled card under its own brand and several others for travel-related
companies such as British Airways and Ritz- Carlton.
[L] The Target and Neiman hacks have also changed the cost calculation: although retailers have
been reluctant to spend the $$6.75 billion that Capgemini consultants estimate it will take to
convert all their registers to be chip-and-PIN-compatible, the potential liability they now face is
dramatically greater. Target has been hit with class actions from hacked consumers.
ultimate nightmare,
[M] The card-payment companies MasterCard and Visa are pushing hard for change. The two
firms have warned all parties in the transaction chain 一merchant, network, bank 一that if they
don't become EMV-compliant by October 2015, the party that is least compliant will bear the
fraud risk.
[N] In the meantime, app- equipped smartphones and digital wallets—all of which can use EMV
technology—are beginning to make inroads（侵袭）on cards and cash. PayPal, for instance, is
testing an app that lets you use your mobile phone to pay on the fly at local merchants—without
surrendering any card information to them. And further down the road is biometric authentication,
which could be encrypted with, say, a fingerprint.
[O] Credit and debit cards, though, are going to be with us for the foreseeable future, and so are
hackers, if we stick with magstripe technology.
English,
That's why it may be up to consumers to move the needle on chip and PIN. Says Robertson:

??When you get the consumer into a position of worry and inconvenience, that's where the rubber
hits the road.
46. It's best to use an EMV card for international travel.
47. Personal information on credit and debit cards is increasingly vulnerable to hacking.
48. The French card companies adopted EMV technology partly because of inefficient telephone
service.
49. While many countries use the smarter EMV cards, the U.S. still clings to its old magstripe
technology.
50. Attempts are being made to prevent hackers from carrying out identity theft.
51. Credit cards are much safer to use than debit cards.
52. Big banks have been reluctant to switch to more secure technology because of the higher costs
involved.
53. The potential liability for retailers using magstripe is far more costly than upgrading their
registers.
54. The use of magstripe cards by American retailers leaves consumers exposed to the risks of
losing account information.
55. Consumers will be a driving force behind the conversion from magstripe to EMV technology.
仔细阅读实际只考了两套

Part IV Translation
汉朝是中国历史上最重要的朝代之一。汉朝统治期间有很多显著的成就。它最先向其他
文化敞开大门，对外贸易兴旺。汉朝开拓的丝網之路通向了中西亚乃至罗马。各类艺术一派
繁荣，涌现了很多文学、历史、哲学巨著。公元100 年中国第一部字典编撰完成，收入9000
个字，提供释义并列举不同的写法。其间，科技方面也取得了很大进步，发明了纸张、水钟、
日暴(sundials)以及测量地震的仪器。汉朝历经400 年，但统治者的腐败最终导致了它的灭
亡。
__