translate-smx
英语演讲稿——我的分数观
for our students,
marks is above everything.
teachers will judge
us from our marks. with marks we
can be
enrolled into junior middle schools. with marks,
we can be enrolled into senior middle schools.
with
marks we can be enrolled into college.
with marks we
can be enrolled into
postgraduate and doctrine studies.
still with
marks we can be graded and be allowed to go
abroad for further studies. our parents will
be strict
with us with the marks. our society
judge us from marks.
however, sometimes we
students pare one another with
marks directly.
we are pletely controlled by marks. we
like
them and we feel sorry for them. but what attitude
towards our marks should we take?
truly,
marks functions cannot be underestimated.
in
terms of test in our study, marks are fair and
real.
that is the reason why we say is equal
before
marks.
however, i think marks are
the sole standard to
judge the success or
failure of students in exams.
sometimes, marks
more than ten or less than one or two
in our exams paring with others mean
not everything.
the success or failure in
exams will be influenced by
experience on the
spot and the examinee’s health etc.
once in a
while one cannot fail in exams.
failure is mon
sense for military.
is familiar with the
famous saying. don’t you think
such will be
the case with our study? in exams, one
cannot
be
will be very good in everyday study, he
cannot succeed
in every exam sometimes. we can
get proof from the fact
that the very best one
we call
the entrance exams for college and
ordinary middle
school and specialized
secondary school over the years
is not eminent
above all others nor top student in every
study.
as a matter of fact, marksand are
not unified. some time ago, a new phrase
but poor petence
meet such a teacher as
this .it is said
d that the teacher just
graduated from a far-famed
key university. but
his teaching result is much less
than that of
the one who just graduated from a
not-
well-renowned college. when lecturing, the teacher
only repeated what the text-books says, which
was very
dull so the his students’ interest in
learning was not
aroused. his teaching was
short of unity of teaching
and learning. at
present there is a fact that we know
a few
brilliant and top college graduates are not
qualified for their posts. the reason for it
may be lack
of the ability to bine knowledge
learnt from books with
pragmatics in their
work. students of this kind will
be successful
in every exam but they will be able to
use
freely their knowledge in their posts. don’t you
think it waste training such persons for the
country?
to sum up from the above, i can say
marks are not
absolutely authoritative for
some. if we neglect
training and developing
the students’ ability and
petence and if we
only seek for the high marks, we will
be
absolutely wrong. we should take an objective
attitude towards the marks. neither should we
neglect
them nor should we overvalue them like
a god.
分数,对于我们学生来说,是至关重要的了。老师要
用分数来衡量我们—
上初中,要分数;上高中,要分数;上
大学要分数,考研究生、博士要分数,出国、评职称还是要
分数。家长要用分数来要求我们;社会用分数来衡量我们。
而我们自己也常常用分数在相互直接做着攀比。我们
完全为分数所左右了,我们为它欢喜,我们为它丧气
。那么,
我们应该怎样对待分数呢?
的确,分数有它不可低估的作用。从检验学习的角度
上
来说,它具有一定的公平性和真实性,“分数面前人人平等”,
讲的就是这个道理。然而,分
数并不是估量一个学生成败得
失的惟一标准。考试成绩偶尔低了一两分乃至十来分,并不
一定说
明什么问题。考试的成败有时也会受到诸如临场经
验、健康状况等方面的影响。“胜败乃是兵家常事”这
句话
大概不会有人不知道,而我们在学习上又何尝不如此?在考
试上很少有“常胜之师”,即使
平时成绩再好的同学,也难
免会有偶尔的失误。历届中考、高考“状元”并非就是平时
出类拔萃
的优等生的事实,便是明证。
事实上,“高分”与“能力”往往是不统一的。前段时
间,
社会上出现了一个新词:“高分低能”。笔者就曾经碰
见这样一位教师,据说他毕业于某赫赫有名的重点
大学,但
从教学效果上讲,却远远逊色于一些非高等学府毕业的老
师。其授课只是照本宣读而已
,枯燥乏味,缺乏一种教与学
之间的协调功能。根本不能引起听课同学的兴趣,目前不少
大中专
院校的高材生毕业后不能胜任他们的工作,原因就在
于缺少将书本中的知识运用到实际工作中去的能力。
这种
人,尽管在学校中每每能考出高分,可无法在工作岗位上灵
活白如地运用自
己所学到的知识。国家培养出这样的“人
材”,不也是一种浪费吗?
由此可见,分数并不
如有些人想象得那么绝对和,忽视
了对各方面才能的培养,只一味追求高分,是不行的。因此,
我们应该客观地去看待分数,既不应过分轻视它,也没有必
要把它看得过于神圣.
三年级下册数学除法应用题-亚信峰会
国外中学-初二数学课程
费改税-汝的意思
思念的近义词-冕怎么读
谒见怎么读-踉跄的读音
稀的词语-英语日期的表达方式
考研考试时间安排-cifs
歧视是什么意思-sometime
-
上一篇:七年级英语成绩分析
下一篇:中学生英语成绩差的成因及对策分析