泰坦尼克英文2011年11月英语二级《笔译实务》试题

2021年1月7日发(作者：崔次丰)

2011年11月英语二级《笔译实务》试题
Section 1: English-Chinese Translation（英译汉）
Part A Compulsory Translation（必译题）
it was done at all.
They say they hope the study will inspire similar collaborations between scientists whose focus is
safely exploiting specific natural resources and those interested mainly in conserving them.
“We need to merge those two communities,” said Steve Murawski, chief fisheries scientist for the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “This paper starts to bridge that gap”
The collaboration began in 2006 when Boris Worm, a marine ecologist at Dalhousie University in
Halifax, Nova Scotia, and other scientists made an alarming prediction: if current trends continue,
by 2048 overfishing will have destroyed most commercially important populations of saltwater
fish. Ecologists applauded the work. But among fisheries management scientists, reactions ranged
from skepticism to fury over what many called an alarmist report.
Among the most prominent critics was Ray Hilborn, a professor of aquatic and fishery sciences at
the University of Washington in Seattle. Yet the disagreement did not play out in typical scientific
fashion with, as Dr. Hilborn put it, “researchers firing critical papers back and forth.” Instead, he
and Dr. Worm found themselves debating the issue on National Public Radio.
“We started talking and found more common ground than we had expected,” Dr. Worm said. Dr.
Hilborn recalled thinking that Dr. Worm “actually seemed like a reasonable person.”
The two decided to work together on the issue. They sought and received financing and began
organizing workshops at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, an
organization sponsored by the National Science Foundation and based at the University of
California, Santa Barbara.
At first, Dr. Hilborn said in an interview, “the fisheries management people would go to lunch and
the marine ecologists would go to lunch” 一 separately. But soon they were collecting and
sharing data and recruiting more colleagues to analyze it.
Dr. Hilborn said he and Dr. Worm now understood why the ecologists and the management
scientists disagreed so sharply in the first place. For one thing, he said, as long as a fish species
was sustaining itself, management scientists were relatively untroubled if its abundance fell to
only 40 or 50 percent of what it might otherwise be. Yet to ecologists, he said, such a stock would
be characterized as “depleted” 一 “a very pejorative word.”
In the end, the scientists concluded that 63 percent of saltwater fish stocks had been depleted
“below what we think of as a target range,” Dr. Worm said.
But they also agreed that fish in well-managed areas, including the United States, were recovering
or doing well. They wrote that management techniques like closing some areas to fishing,
restricting the use of certain fishing gear or allocating shares of the catch to individual fishermen,