sluttySCI论文被接收心得

2021年1月20日发(作者：personal)
SCI
论文被接收心得


第一篇：

杂志：
Talanta

（２
.
８分）

RecEived at Editorial Office: 18-SEP-2007
Article revised: 15-JAN-2008
Article accepted for publication: 18-JAN-2008
专业：生物分析化学类

说起这篇文章，可是让我痛苦了一整年，实验很多，做的很辛 苦，
数据相对繁多，由于这是我第一篇文章，写作方面也是摸石头过河，
逐句的模仿．
为了写这篇文章，
我仔细研读了该领域的大约１００篇
文献，对别人写的好的句子，类似的句子 都做了标记，在写作的过程
中想起要表达什么意思的时候马上随时翻阅，
这样下来，
每 天写一小
段，有时候甚至每天就写那么几小句，大约一个月后，我发现一篇包
含
abs tract,intrduction,experiment,results
and
discussion
初稿居然完成
了．



初 稿完成后，放了大约个把星期不管，接着做其他的实验，待一个
星期过后再来研读，发现文章写的错误百 出，句子连贯性，逻辑性，
以及整篇文章的通读性都很差，
于是又是仔细研读别人的论文，学习
再学习，每天读一点，回头看看自己的文章，再改一点，又是将近个
把月，
一 篇有模有样的初稿出现了，
这时候我迫不极待的想把文章投
出去了，于是放了两三天后，写了个
cover letter,
花了一晚上时间（想
必应该也有人花一整个晚上在
Elsevier
投稿系统上的痛苦经历吧）
，
把稿件投向了一个本领域的分析杂志 ．
稿件投出去大概半个月，
收到
了主编的信，
主编认为我能回答他的问题，< br>以及按他的意见修改就可
能出版．可能是经验欠缺，
我在收到信后的一个星期，就把修改 稿返
回了过去，
对其中的提到的不足和问题我只是在文章中引用了其他一
些文献和做了 自己的说明，
显然，
这样的举动在主编和认为是很不认
真的，过了一个月后，收到了< br>Final Decision
，那就是拒绝了．

Dear ***,

On behalf of the editor handling your manuscript, I am writing to you
in reference to your manuscript entitled:************
I regret to have to inform
you that your manuscript is not suitable for
publication
in
***.
This
decision
has
been
reached
in
light
of
the
comments
made
by
the
referees.
The
detailed
remarks
are
appended
below.
Reviewers’ comments:


Reviewer 1: ************* seemed to contain sufficient material for
publication purpose. However, unfortunately, the authors did not address
sufficiently
what
are
the
main
advantages
of
this
particular
detection
technique over previously reported ones.
*************
Overall, the English language proved to be insufficient for publication
purpose
and
needs
to
be
revised.
Specific
care
should
be
taken
with
regards to prepositions since it can alter the meaning of a statement

Editor:

Unfortunately,
the
reviewer
has
recommended
against
publication
of
this work in ***. In examining the rev
iewer’s specific comments, I note
that some of the comments mirror those that I made when the manuscript
was
initially
submitted.
In
particular,
the
reviewer
indicates
that
the
authors have still not made a convincing case for the advantages of the
proposed
method
over
earlier
techniques.
Given
these
considerations,
I
must regrettably recommend rejection of this manuscript.

就因为没有用心写出文章的优点来，就这样被毙掉了，感到非常痛
心，教训深刻！


接下来，我又挑选了一个杂志，我自认为应该很容易中，因为我在
那个杂志上看到有 类似的文章，
且我自认为内容还不如我的好．
可是
两本杂志属于不同的出版集团，引用文献的格式完全不同，
又痛苦的
花了一个晚上把文献格式改了过来，这种工作就和做针 线活差不多，
睁着眼睛在看，你不能急，一急就郁闷的不得了．

于是乎，又是一翻上 传的痛苦经历，可是，不到两天，不幸又降临
了，居然认为我的稿件不适合该杂志，说白了，就是不想要 嘛．

Dear Dr***,
I am writing to you on behalf of Editor ****.
We regret to inform you that **** is unable to accept your manuscript
*******, Manuscript No. ABC-00938-2007 for publication in *****.
In view of the limited number of pages available to us each year to cover
the entire field of analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, its instrumental
advances
and
its
wide
range
of
applications,
we
can
only
publish
a
selection of the papers submitted to our journal.
We are sorry not to be able to send you better news.
这个时候，什么情绪都有了， 有时候想，是不是自己的工作还没有
够的上档次？是不是文章真的写的很差，
因为还没有接收过 ＳＣＩ论
文，
所以这个时候的自信心真的是非常的差，
后来干脆把文章晾在了
一边．

心情平静下来了又想，
花了这么多心思做的东西，
是不可能放弃的，
况且当初在选这个题目的时候就认为这个工作还是有一定意思和意
义的．

于 是，我根据之前审稿人的意思，又补充了一些实验，在写作上也
丰富了一些．过了一个多月，我又开始了 新的冲击．

这一次，显然，努力得到回报了．

Dear professor ***,

We have received expert review of your manuscript. You will see that
revision
of
your
manuscript
is
advised,
and
suggestions
are
offered
for
improving
the
manuscript
and
it’s
impact.
If
you
are
prepared
to
undertake the work required, I would be pleased to consider the paper for
publication in Talanta.

For your guidance, reviewers’ comments are appended below.

Reviewers’
comments:

Overall,
this
is
a
paper
that
deserves
to
be
published,
but
requires
revision.(
有这一句就够了，当时心情超好，无法形容）

象下面这样的意见，也是非常中肯的，感谢审稿人，感谢编辑，感
谢ＣＣＴＶ！

General comments:

The
English
used
in
this
paper
requires
major
revision.
I
do
not
underestimate
the
challenge
of
writing
a
scientific
paper
in
a
language
that
is
not
the
native
tongue.
However,
the
science
is
currently
being
complicated
by
the
grammar
of
the
paper.
In
particular,
single/plural
conflicts and changes of (and inappropriate use of) tenses (see especially
section
2.5
where
the
middle
third
of
the
text
switches
to
the
present
tense). Improving the paper in this way would ensure that the reader can
focus upon the science
1.
The
discussions
throughout
the
manuscript
is
superficial,
thus
thorough
and
comprehensive
discussions
are
required
in
the
section
of
Results and Discussion.

2. Conclusion should not be a duplication of the Abstract.
当然，也提出了其他的不少意见，这次 我可是对待的相当认真，其
中有一条审稿意见我不太明白，
为此我在某专业论文上发贴和别人讨
论了一个多星期．