presence是什么意思一些英文审稿意见的模板

2021年1月26日发(作者：抵押率)
一些英文审稿意见的模板【转】

来源：

Elaine
王倩的日志



最近导师让我帮忙审了两篇英文文章，
觉 得写的都不怎么样，
顿时觉得自己的也
不太差吧嘿嘿。
但是怎么写评审还是有经验需要 学习，
自己也不能写的太不专业。
不过我的意见也不过是给老师写意见的一个参考，
具 体能不能过我就毋须多言了。


网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1
、目标和结果不清晰。

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with
expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to
English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and
results of the study are clear to the reader.

2
、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

In
general,
there
is a
lack
of
explanation
of
replicates
and
statistical
methods used in the study.
Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various
experiments should be provided.

3
、对于研究设计的
rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.

4
、夸张地陈述结论
/
夸大成果
/
不严谨：

The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show
if
the
side
effects
from
initial
copper
burst
can
be
avoid
with
the
polymer
formulation.

5
、对
hypothesis
的清晰界定：

A hypothesis needs to be presented
。


6
、对某个概念或工具使用的
rationale/
定义概念：

What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?

7
、对研究问题的定义：

Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,
write one section to define the problem

8
、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写
literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.

9
、对
clai m,
如
A
＞
B
的证明，
verification:
There
is
no
experimental
comparison
of
the
algorithm
with
previously
known
work,
so
it
is
impossible
to
judge
whether
the
algorithm
is
an
improvement
on previous work.

10
、严谨度问题：

MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.

11
、格式（重视程度）：

In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but
not
completely
correct.
I
have
attached
a
pdf
file
with

for
Authors
Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly
prepared
and
formatted.
If
you
are
unsure,
please
consult
the
formatting
nstructions
to
authors
that
are
given
under
the

and
Forms
button in he upper right- hand corner of the screen.

12
、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：

有关语言的审稿人意见：

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with
expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to
English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and
results of the study are clear to the reader.

The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper
translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper
review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling
mistakes or are not complete sentences.

As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are
problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.

The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We
strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is
well-versed in English or whose native language is English.