GMAT作文范文2 .doc

GMAT作文范文2


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


2006-05-13


Analysis of Issue #1In some countries, television and radio
programs are carefully censored for offensive language and
behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.
AnswerThe censorship and regulation of broadcast media for
offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry
from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in
preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes
precedence over the freedoms of individual
y, I believe exposure to obscene and
offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such
behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support
this ly, I believe that obscene and offensive
behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character
and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency
toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These effects weaken
the civil cords that hold a democratic society
argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society.
However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution
to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates
of free expression might also point out difficulties in
defining
however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the effort
is beneficial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords
of a democratic conclusion, government should take
a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently
offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of
第页码页 .. 总共总页数页

speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure
of damaging offensive material.


第页码页 .. 总共总页数页